Views: 67 Author: Site Editor Publish Time: 2026-01-21 Origin: Site
Failure Root Cause Engineering: A Systematic Analysis Framework for the Causes of Disc Spring and Wave Spring Failure
The failure of disc springs and wave springs goes beyond surface-level issues, often revealing systemic flaws in design, manufacturing, installation, or usage. Drawing on extensive failure case studies, Jiangsu Sunzo Industry Engineering provides a comprehensive causal analysis framework that traces problems from surface manifestations to root causes. This enables precise identification of core issues and implementation of effective corrective and preventive measures.

Fatigue failure mechanism:
High-cycle fatigue: Stress level below yield limit, number of cycles>10^5, crack initiation from surface defects or stress concentration
Low-cycle fatigue: Local stress exceeds the yield limit, with a cycle count <10⁴, accompanied by significant plastic deformation accumulation
Material performance degradation:
stress relaxation: the elastic modulus decreases under long-term static loading, and the loss rate of pre-tightening force exceeds the design allowable value
CREEP EFFECT: TIME-DEPENDENT DEFORMATION IN HIGH TEMPERATURE ENVIRONMENT
Load Spectrum Mismatch: Actual Operating Load Exceeds Statistical Envelope of Design Load Spectrum
Stress concentration coefficient underestimated: Stress concentration of local geometry such as fillet and groove is underestimated by more than 20%
Resonance risk neglect: The operating frequency coincides with or approaches the natural frequency of the spring
Heat treatment anomaly:
Incomplete martensite transformation due to quenching temperature deviation
Insufficient tempering produces excessive residual stress
The depth of the surface decarburization layer exceeds 1% of its thickness.
forming defect :
Stamping burrs not completely removed
excessive taper
The thickness uniformity does not meet the tolerance requirements of the national standard
Installation deviation: the coaxiality deviation exceeds 0.5% of the installation hole diameter
Lubrication failure: improper lubricant selection or excessively long lubrication interval
Environmental Corrosion: Risk of Stress Corrosion Cracking Caused by Media Corrosion Is Not Considered
Micro-wear-induced fatigue: Oxidation wear particles generated by the micro-motion relative motion between the wave peak and the installation groove
Multi-axis stress state: bending, shear and contact stress at the peak
Frequency Resonance Effect: Resonant Standing Wave Formation of Waveform Structure at Specific Frequency
Over-tightening damage: The elastic force exceeds the required value of the bearing by more than 30%, resulting in peak plastic deformation.
Insufficient preload: fails to effectively eliminate axial clearance, resulting in impact loads
Pre-tension force decay: The pre-tension force decreases by more than 20% of the initial value after long-term use.
The wave height to wave spacing ratio is beyond the optimal range.
End structure defect: excessive stress concentration coefficient in the transition zone of the end ring
Interference of Multi-layer Wave Spring: Additional Friction and Stress Caused by Interlayer Contact
Data acquisition: load spectrum, temperature, vibration spectrum
Macroscopic inspection: fracture morphology, wear pattern, and corrosion characteristics
Microanalysis: Metallographic Structure and Crack Propagation Path
Simulation Verification: Verification of Stress Distribution by Finite Element Analysis
Design responsibility: Error in stress calculation, improper material selection
Manufacturing Responsibility: Process Control Failure, Inspection Omission
Responsibility for: Overloading, lack of maintenance
Environmental responsibility: Unforeseen change of working condition
We provide professional failure analysis solutions:
On-site Investigation: Engineer Collects First-hand Data
Laboratory Analysis: Comprehensive Material and Mechanical Testing Capabilities
Simulation Calculation:Stress Analysis Based on Actual Working Condition
Design optimization suggestion: Design modification based on analysis results
Process Improvement Plan: Targeted Improvement of Manufacturing Process
Follow the guidelines: Develop operational and maintenance specifications
Failure Case Database: Establishing an Industry Failure Case Database
Early-warning Index System:Establishing the Monitoring Standard of Key Parameters
Regular Review Mechanism: Establishing a Regular Review System for Design and Use
Technical improvement based on analysis results:
Consider the load dispersion by using probabilistic design method
Introduce the design concept of damage tolerance
implement reliability growth plan
Establish key characteristic control plan
Implementation of Statistical Process Control (SPC)
Improve the traceability system
Develop a preventive maintenance plan
Establish a health monitoring system
Personnel training and certification
Accurate root cause analysis is the starting point of quality improvement, while systematic preventive measures serve as the safeguard for quality enhancement. Let us employ professional failure analysis techniques to ensure the reliability of your products.